as many of you may know the airforce is phasing the f-15s out for the fa 22. the f22 is mostly composite. its been around since 84. my first dealing with one was of course grounded cuz it cracked.
heres my question. the f-15 is a pretty solid platform being mostly al and ti construction. almost every composite component on the f15 fatigues and leads to failure. the radomes speedbrakes elevators ect.
how is graphite constuction compared to metal construction as far as life fatigue so to speak… do you think the multirole fighter will be up to the job in say 2050??? im not so sure. even the f15 has its problems but the 22…
even the kommy bastard su-33 is a half composite and half metal airframe… it is quite possible the most expensive and most problem ridden aircraft for the reason that it cant stay together.
or are we overlooking the fact that lockheed has now grabbed uncle sam by the nuts with maintenance fees…
just curious. i know composites are stronger and lighter than metal. but for lasting a long time im doubtful… ive seen many a over “g” repairs and even once had a pilot perform his own structural repair as a lesson under my supervision.