So I’m playing around with some numbers, and I keep on running into a problem that I want to ask you guys about. I’m looking to make a drop in replacement carbon tube who’s circular cross section must match both the ID and OD of the steel tube currently in use to be a true drop in replacement. All stresses for the tube are essentially going to be down the axis of it, so it’s prime to be replaced by uni carbon. The commercial component is currently made out of various grades of steel.
My question is: even though CFRP (assuming the correct fiber orientation for the loads encountered) has a specific strength (kN.m/Kg) much higher than steel, it’s not actually stronger on a by-volume basis, right? Would the part would have to be thicker just because CFRP is so low density? To end up with a component that was as strong as the steel version (but lighter), would its cross section have to be thicker? CFRP’s specific strength is 3-7x stronger than steel (depending on the grade), yet in certain cases its also more than 7x as sparse (lower density), meaning that cross section for cross section, it might not be as strong as a steel component. Is my line of reasoning correct here?
I appreciate any input, thanks!